Connect with us

Nova Scotia’s premier wants to learn from Ontario’s nuclear power project

Published

on


Nova Scotia intends to learn more about small modular reactor (SMR) technology from Ontario.

Premier Tim Houston, who became energy minister this week in a cabinet shuffle, signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) Thursday with Ontario Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce.

“We will share knowledge and expertise from technological readiness and regulatory frameworks to supply chains, financing, and nuclear waste management. We’ll work together to engage with the federal government,” said Houston.

New Brunswick, Saskatchewan and Alberta have signed similar agreements with Ontario.

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission says small modular reactors are smaller in size and have a smaller energy output than traditional nuclear power reactors.

The commission also says the smaller reactors have enhanced safety features.

Story continues below advertisement

Ontario’s Darlington nuclear plant was named as a project of national interest by the prime minister this fall.

Expansion of the current Darlington nuclear plant in southern Ontario will make Canada the first G7 country with an operational SMR.

It’s estimated Ontario’s project, which is set to be connected to the grid by 2029, would provide clean power to 300,000 homes and create 200 operations jobs, in addition to 1,600 jobs during construction.

Shortly before the agreement signing, the federal and Ontario governments announced they would be putting a total of $3 billion toward a project to build four small nuclear reactors in the Greater Toronto Area.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

“This is about value added to our Ontario ratepayers and taxpayers. However, we’re Canadians and we’re on Team Canada. Premier Houston and Premier Ford have a strong alliance when it comes to building out that clean energy vision,” said Lecce.

“Going first allows us to share the best practices, the lessons learned with our colleagues east and west.”


Click to play video: 'Nova Scotia’s opposition concerned after premier shuffles cabinet, makes himself energy minister'


Nova Scotia’s opposition concerned after premier shuffles cabinet, makes himself energy minister


Despite signing the MOU, Houston says the technology won’t be coming to Nova Scotia soon.

Story continues below advertisement

“At this stage we don’t have a contract to buy one. We haven’t committed any dollars towards it right now. We need to be part of the process, so we understand what’s possible,” he said.

But the Official Opposition questions what the actual benefit would be for Nova Scotians to bring the technology to the province.

“It’s not going to help us with our energy mix. It’s not going to help us with our energy affordability, and we don’t see any jobs coming,” said NDP Leader Claudia Chender.

“I think it was yet another shiny announcement when what we’re actually looking for our results.”


Environmental concerns

Environmental groups are voicing their concerns with the MOU and the province’s intentions when it comes to pursuing the technology.

“I don’t see it as a practical solution. I see it as … an industrial greed response,” said Badia Nehme with the Ecology Action Centre.

The non-profit group’s stance is that nuclear energy is unlikely to benefit Nova Scotians.

“The province seems more interested in exporting energy solutions as opposed to powering the province,” said Nehme.

“So when they were talking about green hydrogen, it was never actually going to be used here. Even way back when they looked at fracking, that was for sale to the United States.”

Story continues below advertisement

There are also concerns because the environmental impact of these reactors are still unclear.

“These projects require fuel bundles that are irradiated and then they have to be buried because that’s the only solution they have right now is burying it in a community for 500 if not over 1,000 years,” said Nehme.

“Especially with experimental technology, we need make sure things are safe and that they prioritize communities, people and the environment.”

SMRs are being presented as clean energy alternatives capable of replacing fossil fuel and coal plants, while eliminating rural communities’ reliance on diesel generators.

But some point out that SMRs may be unrealistic for a province like Nova Scotia, which is much denser population-wise.

“I wouldn’t want an SMR in my backyard. But I wouldn’t mind having solar panels on my roof or, you know, a wind power project near a rural property that I lived at,” said Keith Brooks, the programs director with Environmental Defence Canada.

–with a file from The Canadian Press 

&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trump just cut off trade talks with Canada. This is the ad he’s blaming

Published

on

By


In a late-night social media post, U.S. President Donald Trump said he is terminating all trade talks with Canada over a television ad against tariffs.

In his Truth Social post, Trump blamed an “egregious” television ad paid for and run by the Ontario government on American television networks.

The ad, featuring images of Americans from all walks of life going about their days over swelling music, is set to several clips from a 1987 radio address by former U.S. president Ronald Reagan.

In the speech, Reagan spoke about “free and fair trade,” and about how he views the risks of tariffs and protectionism against tariffs the U.S. was imposing at the time on Japanese goods.

Story continues below advertisement

The speech in its entirety lasted roughly five minutes, while the Ontario ad lasted one minute, running different excerpts of Reagan’s longer speech together.


Click to play video: 'Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan 1987 speech on tariffs and free trade'


Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan 1987 speech on tariffs and free trade


What Reagan quotes did Ontario use?

Here is the transcript of the advertisement Ontario has been running, using quotes from Reagan’s longer speech.

Story continues below advertisement

“When someone says, let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports, it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works, but only for a short time.

But over the long run, such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars.

Then the worst happens.

Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs.

Throughout the world, there’s a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. America’s jobs and growth are at stake.”

What did the full Reagan speech say?

Reagan’s full speech in 1987 lasted for five minutes:

Story continues below advertisement

“My fellow Americans, Prime Minister Nakasone of Japan will be visiting me here at the White House next week. It’s an important visit because while I expect to take up our relations with our good friend Japan, which overall remain excellent, recent disagreements between our two countries on the issue of trade will also be high on our agenda.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

As perhaps you’ve heard, last week I placed new duties on some Japanese products in response to Japan’s inability to enforce their trade agreement with us on electronic devices called semiconductors.


Now, imposing such tariffs or trade barriers and restrictions of any kind are steps that I am loath to take. And in a moment I’ll mention the sound economic reasons for this, but over the long run such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer.

But the Japanese semiconductors were a special case. We had clear evidence that Japanese companies were engaging in unfair trade practices that violated an agreement between Japan and the United States.

We expect our trading partners to live up to their agreements. As I’ve often said, our commitment to free trade is also a commitment to fair trade. But you know, in imposing these tariffs, we were just trying to deal with a particular problem, not begin a trade war.

So next week, I’ll be giving Prime Minister Nakasone this same message. We want to continue to work cooperatively on trade problems and want very much to lift these trade restrictions as soon as evidence permits. We want to do this because we feel both Japan and the United States have an obligation to promote the prosperity and economic development that only free trade can bring.

Story continues below advertisement

Now that message of free trade is one I conveyed to Canada’s leaders a few weeks ago, and it was warmly received there.

Indeed, throughout the world, there’s a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition.

Now there are sound historical reasons for this. For those of us who live through the Great Depression, the memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing. And today, many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period called the Smoot Hawley Tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.

You see, at first, when someone says, let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports, it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works, but only for a short time.

What eventually occurs is first homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets.

And then while all this is going on, something even worse occurs.

High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers and less and less competition.

Story continues below advertisement

So soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying.

Then the worst happens.

Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industry shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs.

The memory of all this occurring back in the 30s made me determined when I came to Washington to spare the American people the protectionist legislation that destroys prosperity.

Now, it hasn’t always been easy. There are those in the Congress just as there were back in the 30s, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who risk America’s prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group who forget that more than five million American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business and additional millions are tied to imports.

Well, I’ve never forgotten those jobs, and on trade issues, by and large, we’ve done well. In certain select cases, like the Japanese semiconductors, we’ve taken steps to stop unfair practices against American products, but we’ve still maintained our basic long-term commitment to free trade and economic growth.

So, with my meeting with Prime Minister Nakasone and the Venice Economic Summit coming up, it’s terribly important not to restrict a president’s options in such trade dealings with foreign governments.

Story continues below advertisement

Unfortunately, some in the Congress are trying to do exactly that. I’ll keep you informed on this dangerous legislation because it’s just another form of protectionism, and I may need your help to stop it. Remember, America’s jobs and growth are at stake. Until next week, thanks for listening and God bless you.

 


Click to play video: 'The Ontario anti-tariff ad which lead Trump to end trade talks with Canada'


The Ontario anti-tariff ad which lead Trump to end trade talks with Canada


Earlier Thursday night, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute posted on X that an ad created by the government of Ontario “misrepresents the ‘Presidential Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade’ dated April 25, 1987.”

Story continues below advertisement

It added that Ontario did not receive foundation permission “to use and edit the remarks.”

The foundation said it is “reviewing legal options in this matter” and invited the public to watch the unedited video of Reagan’s address.

For more on how Canadian leaders are responding, read the latest here.

— With files from The Associated Press





Source link

Continue Reading

Ontario trustee who education minister sought to fire resigns, tied to Italy art trip

Published

on

By


An Ontario school trustee who the province’s education minister sought to fire through legislation has now resigned.

Mark Watson was one of four trustees with the Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board who took a $45,000 trip to Italy to buy $100,000 worth of art for the board.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

The controversial trip is one of several examples of what Ontario Education Minister Paul Calandra has cited as evidence of misuse of public dollars at some school boards and a need for a governance overhaul.

Three of the four trustees repaid their trip expenses, but Calandra has said Watson refused to pay his share back in full and still owes more than $12,000.

Calandra tabled a bill Monday with the sole purpose of firing Watson and barring him from being a trustee at any Ontario school board until 2030.

Story continues below advertisement

Watson has not responded to a request for comment, but on Friday the board said he had resigned.


&copy 2025 The Canadian Press





Source link

Continue Reading

‘Thousands of liters of hazardous material seized’: Trio arrested in drug lab bust

Published

on

By


A massive synthetic drug lab in Ontario has been dismantled following a months-long RCMP investigation that led to three arrests and the seizure of millions of dollars’ worth of illegal drugs, chemicals and equipment.

Police say the operation, known as Project Overboil, began when officers noticed suspicious chemical purchases linked to a company called Oquin Industries.

The investigation uncovered a sophisticated clandestine laboratory hidden on a large rural property in Schomberg, Ont., along with a second storage site in Port Colborne.

The bust, which was carried out in early Sept., revealed a fully operating synthetic drug lab with thousands of litres of hazardous waste and materials that took 10 days to neutralize on site.

“The arrest of three individuals and the seizure of numerous items represent a significant disruption to the illegal drug trade in Canada,” Supt. Jonathan Ko, officer in charge of the Central Region Organized Crime, said during a press conference Friday morning.

Story continues below advertisement

RCMP teams executed search warrants on Sept 7, 2025, seizing approximately 239 kilograms of finished product, including MDMA, GHB and methamphetamines, along with $8,000 in cash, a range of precursor chemicals such as acetone, methanol and hydrochloric acid, and industrial drug-making equipment, including pill presses and rotary evaporators.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Two firearms and prohibited magazines were also recovered.

The suspects, identified by RCMP as Christopher O’Quinn, Liang Gao and Katie King, face a combined 33 charges related to drug production, trafficking and firearms offences.


Police said O’Quinn has a previous criminal record, while the other two do not.

He added that authorities were tipped off after the company stopped buying those chemicals for three years, and then suddenly started again, which made investigators suspicious.

The purchased chemicals are known to be used in the production of many street drugs like fentanyl, MDMA, methamphetamines and other chemo-synthetic drugs.

Chief Supt. Chris Leather added that the significance of the operation goes far beyond the value of the seized substances.

“While it involved the seizure of millions of dollars’ worth of suspected controlled substances and cash, the true importance lies in the fact that we removed a synthetic drug lab and neutralized thousands of litres of hazardous waste,” Lather said.

Story continues below advertisement

“We prevented the future production of millions of dollars’ worth of synthetic drugs and averted a potentially dangerous public safety incident posed by the unsafe storage of dangerous chemicals.”

He added that the case reflects “a growing national trend, the rise of synthetic opioid production within Canada.”

Since Jan. 1, 2024, the RCMP have dismantled a total of 50 clandestine drug laboratories.

&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 | Ottawa Today