Canada’s world junior trial saw juries tossed, intense testimony. Here’s a recap
Five members of Canada’s 2018 world junior hockey team will wait weeks until their fate in their high-profile sexual assault trial is determined.
Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote have been on trial since late April inside a London, Ont., courtroom – accused of engaging in non-consensual group sex with a then-20-year-old woman in June 2018.
All five men pleaded not guilty to sexual assault when the trial began on April 22; McLeod also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of being a party to the offence of sexual assault.
The roller-coaster trial wrapped up Friday, and Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia will summon everyone back in July to deliver her ruling.
Here is what unfolded over the eight weeks the trial played out inside the courtroom.
Trial saw 2 juries tossed, marathon questioning of complainant
It initially started as a jury trial, but just a few days in, a mistrial was declared out of concern for a tainted jury after a juror accused Hillary Dudding, one of Formenton’s lawyers, of initiating conversation while in line for lunch.
Dudding denied this and said any contact with the juror was inadvertent.

The trial resumed the following week with a new jury, and they would go on to watch videos of the complainant, known as E.M., taken by McLeod, hear from then-teammate Taylor Raddysh about a group-chat screenshot he took capturing the “3 way” message by McLeod, and hear from E.M. herself.
The now-27-year-old woman, whose identity is protected under a standard publication ban, was subject to intense cross-examination during her nine days on the stand.
Court heard the team was in London for events marking its gold-medal performance at that year’s championship, and that the complainant was out with friends when they met at a downtown bar on June 18, 2018.
Get daily National news
Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
After being with McLeod and his teammates at the bar, E.M. would go on to have consensual sex with McLeod in his room in the early morning hours of June 19. Court has heard that E.M., who testified she was drunk and not of clear mind, was in the washroom after she had sex with McLeod and came out to a group of men in the room allegedly invited by McLeod in the group chat.
It was then that the Crown alleges several sexual acts took place without E.M.’s consent.

Defence lawyers have suggested E.M. wasn’t as drunk as she has testified she was, wanted a “wild night” with the players and was “egging” them on to have sex with her, and accused her of having a “clear agenda” at the trial.
E.M. has pushed back against those claims and at points outright rejected them, saying she was coaxed into staying in the room and was disrespected and taken advantage of by the group, who she said “could see I was out of my mind.”
After E.M. finished her testimony, then-teammate Tyler Steenbergen took the stand as a Crown witness, but his testimony was halted just two days in.
Court received a note from a juror stating they believed Formenton’s lawyers, Dudding and Dan Brown, would “turn to each other and laugh as if they are discussing our appearance” when the jury was entering the room.
Carroccia said she was concerned this could impact some jurors’ ability to fairly decide the case and that it could have a chilling effect on the defence lawyers. Brown and Dudding called the juror’s note an “unfortunate misinterpretation” and said “the very idea of counsel making light of a juror is illogical and runs directly counter to our purpose and function.”

Carroccia would go on to dismiss that jury, and the trial would go on by judge alone.
Only 1 accused would testify, Crown witness scrutinized
Eventually, court would go on to hear from police officers involved in the initial case in 2018 – and the renewed case in 2022 – and other players from that year’s team.
Vegas Golden Knights forward Brett Howden came under intense questioning during his time on the stand, and at one point briefly broke down in tears.
He teared up as he described feeling scared and nervous after learning Hockey Canada had launched an investigation into the encounter and realizing he would have to explain the situation to his parents and his girlfriend, now his wife.
Howden was accused by the Crown of feigning memory loss on details that could be damaging to his friends – which Carroccia ruled was unfounded – and faced questions in a voir dire over a text conversation the Crown wanted to introduce as evidence due to his lack of memory.
That conversation, which Crown prosecutors described as “critical,” was not admitted as evidence after Carroccia ruled against it twice.

Only Hart would testify at the trial, while the other players’ lawyers cited evidence and police interviews that were already played in court as part of the reasons why their clients were opting not to testify.
Hart testified in part that E.M. was asking the players to have sex with her, and he chose to ask for oral sex because he did not want to have intercourse. He said it was “consensual” and brief because it was “weird.”
Hart would agree with Crown prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham under cross-examination that he was “putting a lot of faith in your friend, Mr. McLeod, to set something up that was morally acceptable to you.”
During closing submissions, defence lawyers called the trial “historic” and repeatedly attacked E.M.’s credibility, saying she “created a lie” out of regret and embarrassment, and that throughout the night, her “communication of consent is overwhelming.”
Meanwhile, the Crown urged the judge to convict the men, with prosecutor Meaghan Cunningham arguing the men were “reckless” for engaging in group sex with E.M. and not seeking her affirmative consent.
Cunningham said E.M. is a credible witness because she was abundantly fair in the trial, clear and concise, not resentful and confirmatory. She argued many defence submissions on E.M.’s behaviour are based on assumptions about how someone in her situation would act.
Court will resume at on July 24, when Carroccia will deliver her ruling.
© 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
The Ford government is delaying its own affordable housing measures in several major Ontario cities, calling the rules it wrote “unnecessary red tape and requirements” that make it more expensive to build.
The pause will affect inclusionary zoning rules in Toronto, Kitchener and Mississauga, a policy that requires developers to provide a minimum number of affordable housing units in certain situations.
Legislation introduced by the government in May 2025 said municipalities could mandate new projects near transit stations to include five per cent affordable units for a maximum of 25 years after their construction.
It was a provincial compromise that Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow said came nowhere near what she had hoped she could ask for from developers, but which she grudgingly accepted in a meeting with Premier Doug Ford.
“I went in and said, ‘Give us 20 per cent.’ In fact, I appealed for 30 per cent. I said to the premier, ‘We need to build housing — not all of it, but 20, 30 per cent people can afford. It’s a perfect opportunity,’” Chow said at a news conference on Tuesday.
“He said no and now it’s five per cent. I had no choice, I said, ‘OK, five per cent, all right. At least it’s five per cent.’”
Now, the government is pausing its own plan, saying requiring developers to build even five per cent of their units at affordable rates will hurt the construction of new homes.
“We need to get more shovels in the ground to build homes for families across the province — now is not the time to be adding unnecessary red tape and requirements that only increase the cost of building a home,” a spokesperson for Housing Minister Rob Flack, who introduced the legislation less than a year ago, said.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
“These temporary measures will help to ensure project viability so more people can call the city of Toronto home.”

The regulation posted by the provincial government proposes pausing the five per cent inclusionary zoning until July 1, 2027. It said Kitchener had already opted to pause its program.
“MMAH has heard from stakeholders expressing concerns that implementing IZ at this juncture, particularly in Toronto, could have a negative impact on overall housing supply and could result in the cancellation or pause of projects,” the regulation said.
Chow, however, said she didn’t believe the requirement was slowing development in her city. She said most builders had stopped working in current conditions, and the few that were still in construction were doing so because of financial incentives from city hall.
“People need homes they can afford,” she said. “Right here, in Toronto, seven out of 10 homes that are being built, if you see a crane, most likely it’s made possible, the building is made possible, because the city has put in financial incentives.”
The Building Industry and Land Development Association said in a statement that the delay was a “prudent” move.
“This will safeguard the already very fragile pipeline of new housing in the province as the market grapples with the lowest sales seen in decades, declining starts and mounting layoffs in the GTA,” the statement said.
“Present cost-to-build challenges, new home sales, and market conditions are extremely dire in the province and adding even more costs through IZ requirements would simply further erode project viabilities and result in even fewer housing units coming to the market.”
The Ford government ran its 2022 election campaign partly under the promise that it would build 1.5 million new homes by 2031 to lower the cost of housing in the province. It’s a strategy that has stalled to the point that the finance minister recently called the 1.5 million goal a “soft target,” after years of failing to hit key milestones, even after watering down the criteria.
Flack told Global News last year that recent provincial housing measures were designed to revive the spring market for 2026, after consecutive years where the number of housing starts in Ontario fell — often at sharper rates than the rest of the country.
The fall-off in development has perhaps been most acute in Toronto.
Between 2020 and 2025, 25 projects have stopped sales on more than 3,200 new units in and around Toronto, numbers compiled by BILD show.
A total of six projects stopped selling in 2020, with five more giving up the following year. In 2022, 10 projects abandoned sales attempts, while four more folded in 2023.
BILD said no projects had stopped selling in 2024 or 2025 because fewer than 10 highrises have even tried to launch over the last two years, as builders struggle to make the costs work and buyers stay away.
The low sales matter to builders because most condominium projects require the majority of their units to be sold in order to finalize financing to get construction off the ground.
Richard Lyall, president of RESCON, said recent data shows “we are staring into the abyss” when it comes to residential construction.
— with a file from The Canadian Press
© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
Gaye and Jim O’Neill have spent countless hours thinking about their daughter’s final hours in April 2023.
It’s a memory they say they’d wish on no one — and it’s the reason why they joined a years-long legal campaign to change the way medical assistance in dying is delivered in British Columbia.
The O’Neills are at the centre of a Charter of Rights challenge, now before the B.C. Supreme Court, that seeks to end the practice of so-called “forced transfers” — compelling patients to leave faith-based medical facilities before receiving medical assistance in dying.
Sam O’Neill died with medical assistance at age 34, roughly a year after she was diagnosed with cervical cancer that had spread to other parts of her body.
Her family remembers Sam, the eldest of three children, as stubborn and fiercely independent, kind and encouraging. She loved animals — so much so that she tried to convince loved ones to take up her vegan lifestyle.
“She would stick up for the rights of animals, but she also stuck up for the rights for people. She never wanted a bad word about people,” said Gaye O’Neill.
Sam travelled the world before moving from her home province of Ontario to Vancouver, where she built a rich life with a close-knit circle of friends. She wrote a travel blog, which Gaye said was “hysterically funny.”
Sam was active: she played soccer and hockey as a kid, and her kind nature and big heart endeared her to teammates. She logged a personal best time in her 10th marathon in California in December 2021.
So it was a shock to her parents when, just four months later in April 2022, they learned she was sick.
Gaye and Jim flew to Vancouver on May 1 to see her.

“She was supposed to be running (a marathon) that day, but she was in a hospital with cancer. So it was terrible,” Jim said.
She went through chemotherapy and radiation treatments, spending that year in and out of Vancouver’s St. Paul’s Hospital. The hospital is operated by Providence Health Care Society, a Catholic organization that runs 18 health care facilities in the Vancouver area.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday.
Sam was assessed for medical assistance in dying, better known as MAID, early in 2023 — something she didn’t tell her family about in advance.
“I was talking to her over the phone. She said she qualified for MAID and I thought she was getting someone to clean her house,” Jim said.
Sam wanted the option of MAID in the event that things got worse, he said.
Things got worse in March 2023. Sam hurt herself while unpacking from a move, her parents said, and she was taken back to St. Paul’s by ambulance.
Over the next several weeks, the staff tried to help her manage the pain.
“I remember one palliative care doctor saying, ‘She’s on as high a dosage that’s safe. We can’t give her more pain meds,’” Jim said.
After two painful procedures in early April, Sam decided to obtain a medically assisted death. She needed first to move from the hospital where she was receiving treatment — because Providence does not allow assisted dying in its facilities. The province of B.C. allows faith-based organizations to be exempt from its MAID policies.
Court documents filed by Providence state that Sam was aware that she wouldn’t be allowed to end her life at St. Paul’s.
Sam was transferred to St. John Hospice. The hospice itself is also run by Providence, but there is an adjacent space in the same building, which is operated by Vancouver Coastal Health, where MAID is permitted.
Her parents said her final hours were spent in agony and her ability to say goodbye to loved ones was impeded by the need to sort out logistics for her transfer.
Her parents said that when they went to see her one final time before the move, they were distressed to find her sitting on a commode and wrapped in a sheet.
“It was shocking and terrible … it was just so humiliating for her,” Gaye said.
Sam was heavily sedated for the transfer and did not wake up again.

Providence defended the care Sam received in court filings, stating that her family and friends were able to “say goodbye to her privately in her room throughout the day.” The organization also said she chose to be sedated before the move.
Its statement of defence also says that Sam’s condition affected her gastrointestinal function and she was “on a commode for her comfort and at her request.”
Daphne Gilbert, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, said she heard about the O’Neill family’s story through the media and contacted them to see if they’d be interested in taking the case to court.
“I had been looking for and thinking about ways to litigate the issue of forced transfers, and I knew that we needed a plaintiff who would be willing to be part of the lawsuit,” she said.
Alongside advocacy group Dying With Dignity Canada and Dr. Jyothi Jayaraman — a palliative care physician who left her job with Providence Health because she disagreed with the practice of transferring MAID patients — the O’Neills are now arguing their case before the B.C. Supreme Court.
The court will be asked to decide whether institutions like Providence have the same rights to protection of freedom of religion as individuals. Providence will argue that it does and that being required to deliver MAID would infringe upon its rights.
The Charter challenge likely will end up being appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, Gilbert said.
That means Gaye and Jim O’Neill have a fight ahead of them that could last years.
“We cannot do anything at all to help Sam. There’s nothing we can do. What’s done is done,” Gaye said.
“We want to protect other people,” Jim added.
Air Canada says it is investigating an incident last month where a ground crew member was trapped inside the cargo hold of a flight departing Toronto, after video of the event surfaced on social media earlier this month.
The incident occurred on Air Canada Flight AC1502, scheduled to travel from Toronto Pearson Airport to Moncton, N.B., on Dec. 13, 2025.
In a video posted Jan. 3, 2026, by a passenger using the handle @travel.with.stephy, a voice can be heard on the intercom addressing passengers following the aircraft’s return to the gate.
“I’ve never had that in my life… first time, hopefully the last,” the voice said. “That’s the reason we had to go back to the gate and get that person out of the airplane. The good news is that the person is perfectly fine and safe.”
He said paperwork needed to be completed before departure and apologized for the delay, assuring passengers the flight would proceed to Moncton as soon as possible.
Get daily National news
Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
According to the passenger, the aircraft had already begun taxiing when a baggage crew member could be heard yelling for help and banging from underneath the aircraft.
The passenger later wrote that the flight ultimately did not reach Moncton that day and that travellers were informed the delay was considered outside the airline’s control.
In a statement to Global News, Air Canada confirmed the incident, saying the aircraft’s cargo doors were inadvertently closed while a member of the ground crew was inside.
“Upon discovery, the aircraft returned to the gate and the doors were opened,” the airline said. “There were no injuries.”
The video prompted widespread reaction online, with commenters expressing concern over ground-handling safety procedures and questioning how such an incident could occur.
One commenter who claimed to work as ground crew wrote under the post, “I used to be a baggage guy, this is scary.”
The incident is currently under investigation.
© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
-
Uncategorized7 months agoShop Proud, Eat Proud, Be Proud — Ottawa Canada Day Market This June 28th
-
7 months agoOntario First Nation residents take shelter in Toronto-area amid wildfires
-
7 months ago161 bricks of suspected cocaine found on truck trying to cross Canada-U.S. border
-
7 months agoRing of Fire road to bring prosperity to First Nation, problems for caribou: report
-
7 months agoMeasles circulating in northeastern B.C. community, health officials warn
-
7 months agoFormer major leaguer, Jays doctor Ron Taylor dies
-
7 months agoJagmeet Singh apologizes for attending Kendrick Lamar concert after Drake calls him out
-
7 months agoAnishinabek Nation chief says he briefed Ontario police on protests against Bill 5